Section: Module 2: Legal and Ethical Considerations for Policy Development | Health Policy and Management | NextGenU.org
-
Competencies covered in this module:

- Discuss multiple dimensions of the policy-making process, including the roles of ethics and evidence.
- Describe the legal and ethical bases for public health and health services.
- Review legislation, codes of ethical practice, and standards that affect public health professional practice in the interaction with individuals, organizations, and communities.
- Describe the legal and ethical bases for public health and health services.
- Compare and contrast the relevant international, European, and national laws or regulations to maximize opportunities to protect and promote health and well-being.
-
-
Read the beginning of the "Discussion" section until "Proportionality." (19 minutes)
BMC Medical Ethics - 2014
-
Read the section 1.4.1. Research Ethics, Clinical Ethics, and Bioethics: Principlism and the Four Principles. (10 minutes)
NCBI - 2016
-
Read the entire article. (12 minutes)
AJPH - 2020
-
Select the + sign to expand the for each law/regulation. Read all of the content for each law/regulation. (13 minutes)
Substance Use and Mental Health Services and Administration - 2021
-
Read the entire article. (23 minutes)
Social Work Public Health/NBCI - 2013
-
Activity 5: Ethical Implications of Substance Use Disorder Legislation (240 minutes) Forum
You will research substance use disorder legislation in your region and reflect on ethical implications for individuals, organizations, and communities.
Instructions:
Step 1: Review and Research
Review the learning resources on the steps of policy-making and on ethical implications at the individual, organizational, and community levels of substance use disorder legislation. Then, research legislation in your region pertaining to substance use disorders.
Step 2: Reflect
In 400-500 words, write a reflection on the implications of the regional legislation you chose. It should include:
A brief introduction to your chosen legislation (quoted and cited)
State why you chose to reflect on the particular choice
Briefly clarify what is meant by individual, organizational, and community levels
State what you understand by the term “ethical implications” as it applies to legislation
Reflect on the ethical implications of your chosen legislation at each level
Step 3: Share
To share your work, click on the “Add a new discussion topic” button under this post and paste your work in the “Message” box. “Post to forum.” Make sure to reference others’ intellectual property when necessary. All references should follow 7th Edition APA formatting. For further instructions, see the resource on the Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library: APA citation resource (N.B. references are excluded from word counts).
OPTIONAL Step 4: Interact (10 minutes)
If you would like to, you can reply to your peers' posts in a respectful and professional manner. Ensure that your post engages your peers' ideas by including a reflection on their comments, sharing ideas of other potential difficulties and parties involved, or asking thought-provoking questions. If a peer comments on your posting, please reply. To post a reply, click “Reply” on a particular discussion, write your feedback and then click on “Post to forum.”
-
-
-
Read the entire article. (5 minutes)
The Lancet - 2020
-
-
Read the entire article. (15 minutes)
WHO - 2015
-
Read the entire document except for the Section: Foreword. (14 minutes)
International Paralympic Committee - 2012
-
-
Read the entire PDF. (43 minutes)
WHO - 2016
-
Activity 6: Legislation and Public Health (180 minutes) Forum
You will discuss how legislation ensures the quality of public health and how it shapes the progression of public health.
Instructions:
Step 1: Review and Identify
Review the learning resources on how legislation ensures the quality of public health, and look at the role of the IHR (2005).
Step 2: Discuss
In 300-400 words, write a discussion on the role of legislation in ensuring quality public health and for progression in the field.
Your discussion should include:What you think is the importance of having legislation in public health and how it encourages countries to strive for a level of quality in public health.
Your views on how legislation has shaped and facilitated public health progression and how you think it will continue to do this in the future.
Make sure to use at least one example to support your arguments for each of the points above.
Step 3: Share
To share your work, click on the “Add a new discussion topic” button under this post and paste your work in the “Message” box. “Post to forum.” Make sure to reference others’ intellectual property when necessary. All references should follow 7th Edition APA formatting. For further instructions, see the resource on the Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library: APA citation resource (N.B. references are excluded from word counts).
OPTIONAL Step 4: Interact (10 minutes)
If you would like to, you can reply to your peers' posts in a respectful and professional manner. Ensure that your post engages your peers' ideas by including a reflection on their comments, sharing ideas of other potential difficulties and parties involved, or asking thought-provoking questions. If a peer comments on your posting, please reply. To post a reply, click “Reply” on a particular discussion, write your feedback and then click on “Post to forum.”
-
Activity 7: Comparison of Public Health Legislation (240 minutes) Forum
You are provided with two examples of legislation related to health protection, promotion, and well-being internationally and based in Europe. You are required to research and compare these examples with the equivalent regulation in your country.
Instructions:
Step 1: Review and Research
Review the provided international and European legislation:
International Health Regulations (2005) [Visions and Goals pages 13 to 16]
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: Article 168 (protection of public health)
Then, research similar legislation in your country.
Step 2: Evaluate
In 900-1000 words, you will now evaluate and compare the three pieces of legislation. Your evaluation should:
Compare and discuss how well each legislation achieves health protection, promotion, and well-being.
State which of the three you think will hold a country’s government most accountable if public health standards and duties are not held, and why.
State if you think any legislation seems more powerful or effective than the others, and why?
Step 3: Share
To share your work, click on the “Add a new discussion topic” button under this post and paste your work in the “Message” box. Make sure to reference others’ intellectual property when necessary. All references should follow 7th Edition APA formatting. For further instructions, see the resource on the Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library: APA citation resource (N.B. references are excluded from word counts).
OPTIONAL Step 4: Interact (10 minutes)
If you would like to, you can reply to your peers' posts in a respectful and professional manner. Ensure that your post engages your peers' ideas by including a reflection on their comments, sharing ideas of other potential difficulties and parties involved, or asking thought-provoking questions. If a peer comments on your posting, please reply. To post a reply, click “Reply” on a particular discussion, write your feedback and then click on “Post to forum.”
-
Quiz: Module 2
To access the quiz, click on the name of the quiz provided above. On the following screen, click the Attempt Quiz button to view the case studies and respond to the questions.
TO PASS THIS QUIZ YOU MUST OBTAIN A SCORE OF 80%.