Section: Module 4: Capacity Strengthening in Global Health | Global Health | NextGenU.org
-
Competencies covered in this module:

- Design sustainable workforce development strategies for resource-limited settings.
-
Read the content on page 1, except for the title "Challenges". (3 minutes)
intrac of civil society - 2021
-
-
Read the content under the heading "Abstract," "Background," and "Conclusion." (17 minutes)
Globalization and Health - 2019
-
Read the content under the heading "Abstract," "Background," and "Conclusion." (15 minutes)
International Journal of Health Policy and Medicine - 2018
-
Read the following content "Selecting a tool", and "Specific Situations for using the tools on pages 5-12. (27 minutes)
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Informing Change - 2017
-
Read the entire page. (10 minutes)
The Lancet - 2018
-
Read the "Background" and "Discussion: Implication 3." (16 minutes)
BMC Health Services Research - 2020
-
Discussion Forum 4 - An Assessment of a GHO’s Operational Capacity (300 minutes)
In this activity, you will select a global health organization and discuss which tool is the most ideal to assess its operational capacity.
Step 1. Explore
Explore the NIH Fogarty International Center webpage. Among the listed Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) working in global health research, choose one and access the hyperlink that corresponds to it. Then, examine the website of the chosen organization by exploring tabs and other features that are associated with its operational capacity.
Step 2. Reflect
Reflect on how to assess the operational capacity of the selected organization by exploring these capacity assessment tools.
- CIP Operating Organizational Assessment Tool: review only the Operational Capacity table.
- M. Casey Org. Capacity Assessment Tool: review only the operational capacity assessment table ( page 28) and the operational capacity rubric (pp.20-24)
Step 3. Respond
Respond by writing a 300-600 word discussion piece that addresses the following:
- A brief description of your selected organization.
- Comparison between the two tools based on their characteristics and functionality to assess operational capacity.
- An explanation to support which between the tools is the most ideal to assess the operational capacity of the selected organization.
Step 4. Share
To share your work, click on the “Add a new discussion topic” button under this post and paste your complete discussion piece in the “Message” box. Make sure to reference others’ intellectual property when necessary. All references should follow 7th Edition APA formatting. For further instructions, see the resource on the Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library: APA citation resource (N.B. references are excluded from word counts).
OPTIONAL Step 5: Interact (10 minutes)
If you would like to, you can reply to your peers' posts in a respectful and professional manner. Ensure that your post engages your peers' ideas by including a reflection on their comments, sharing ideas of other potential difficulties and parties involved, or asking thought-provoking questions. If a peer comments on your posting, please reply. To post a reply, click “Reply” on a particular discussion, write your feedback and then click on “Post to forum.”
-
Read the entire tool. (41 minutes)
Advancing Partners & Communities - 2012
-
Read the entire document. (2 minutes)
Healthy People 2020-US Department of Health and Human Services - 2010
-
Read the entire page. (3 minutes)
The University of Memphis - 2019
-
Read the content under "Introduction" and "Advantages of including CHWs in the health workforce " and "Cost-effectiveness of CHW programmes." (9 minutes)
WHO - 2016
-
Read the entire page. (19 minutes)
Health Affairs - 2016
-
Read the content in the sections "Abstract," "1. Introduction," "2. Community Based Programs Sustainability and Sustainability Factors," and "6. Discussion." (19 minutes)
Sustainability - 2018
-
Read pages 2-9 of the document. (23 minutes)
USAID - 2012
-
Read the content under Introduction, Discussion, and Summary. (30 minutes)
Journal - 2012
-
Watch the entire video. (5 minutes)
Scottish Community Development Center - 2010
-
Peer Activity 6 - Strengthening Capacity for Global Health. (360 minutes) Forum
In this activity, you will discuss strategies for integrating community assets to aid in strengthening the health workforce of resource-limited settings and reduce health disparities.
Step 1. Review
Review the learning resources for this module before studying the case scenario for this activity.
Step 2. Study
Study this case scenario.
Case Scenario
Step 3. ProposeYou are the lead health strategic officer of a rural community. The local authorities have set a goal to address the increasing rates of vaccine hesitancy within your community. Initial analysis has shown disparities in terms of health literacy among people of different ages, educational backgrounds, and internet access. As this is a small community, there is a limited number of trained health workers and the authorities have asked to make an effort on integrating community assets in the strategy. Therefore, you have been asked to propose strategies that could be used to achieve this goal.
Write a 400-700 words proposal where you:- Propose two different strategies to improve mental health literacy in the community. The proposed strategies should aim to involve community assets to achieve this goal.
- Provide a rationale for each strategy and explain their strengths and weaknesses.
- Explain additional measures that should be in place to ensure that the intervention also addresses gaps in terms of age, education, and internet access.
Step 4. Share
To share your work, click on the “Add a new discussion topic” button under this post and paste your operational assessment table, including the summary in the “Message” box. Make sure to reference others’ intellectual property when necessary. All references should follow 7th Edition APA formatting. For further instructions, see the resource on the Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library: APA citation resource (N.B. references are excluded from word counts).
Step 5: Interact
Evaluate and categorize the work from one of your peers based on items A - E of this rubric. Provide a rationale for the grade you’ve provided, as well as comments or suggestions for improvement. To post a reply, click “Reply” on a particular discussion, write your feedback and then click on “Post to forum.” You can use the list below as an example:
Item A is .…. because…. My suggestions for improvement are….
Item B is .…. because…. My suggestions for improvement are….
Item C is .…. because…. My suggestions for improvement are….
Item D is .…. because…. My suggestions for improvement are….
Item E is .…. because…. My suggestions for improvement are…. -
Quiz: Module 4
To access the quiz, click on the name of the quiz provided above. On the following screen, click the "Preview quiz now" button to respond to the questions.
TO PASS THIS QUIZ, YOU MUST OBTAIN A SCORE OF 80%